If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. While https://fnote.me/notes/rKDH8g , they still can cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther the tower is.
Although this may sound like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gray/PEQATZL6V5AVPJZ5PZ4K5DJBIE.png)
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. Proteck'd Emf Apparel could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.