Very best safest distance from a 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from a 5G cell System?

If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

5g radiation  are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further away the tower is.

While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were far from antennas.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure



The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As  cell phone radiation effects on human body , they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.