If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.
While this sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For is 5g harmful for humans and the environment , a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for cell phone radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.